Theory of marriage

April 15, 2017
2 min read

Marriage is a strange relationship. I don’t think any couple is perfectly in sync. If that was so one of the two must be highly submissive.

Still there must be certain level of sameness. Most of the time it is the theory of complementary that applies. I mean the relationship exists because one lacks the others quality and vice versa.

Myself I’m a celebral. I’ve got my head in the clouds most of the time but I’m also muscular to be practical and need to be fit on all levels from physical to financial. But i don’t like to be in control , to be responsible, to do pr, to plan on money. My wife is an osseous who needs control as we need air. She’s a celebral at the secondary enough to leave me in the clouds.

I just couldn’t care less of what happens to my money and family but she does care.

On the other hand the extreme control freakishness of hers sometimes even gets on my nerve.

I would have enjoyed a celebral wife who would follow me with gutso but who’d control my life ?

An alimentary would have shut up and just fed me. But again I’d find myself in leadership role too much excluding me from my solitude.

A thoric is outv of question. I d be burned out and broke in year one .

A muscular would think I’m going to range us to the streets with my career in my head.

So i can’t say i m in a bad marriage.

I just wish she subdued her celebral aspect less.